What is a 112 rejection?

What is a 112 rejection? A Section 112 rejection in a patent Office Action means that the examiner considers certain claim language indefinite. Section 112 rejections are often regarded as “non-substantive” by patent practitioners because

What is a 112 rejection?

A Section 112 rejection in a patent Office Action means that the examiner considers certain claim language indefinite. Section 112 rejections are often regarded as “non-substantive” by patent practitioners because they typically relate to the form, and not the substance, of the claims.

What is a reasonable interpretation?

Under a broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI), words of the claim must be given their plain meaning, unless such meaning is inconsistent with the specification. The plain meaning of a term means the ordinary and customary meaning given to the term by those of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention.

What is claim differentiation?

One important rule of interpretation is the “doctrine of claim differentiation.” This doctrine, in effect, assumes that two claims in the same patent will not have the identical scope, but instead, that there is likely an intended difference in scope between the two.

What is a 102 rejection?

102 Rejections In order to obtain a patent on an invention, one of the legal requirements under U.S. law is that the invention be new or novel. An application may be rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 if a single prior art reference matches each and every element of a patent application’s claim.

What is a 101 rejection?

If your application has received a Section 101 rejection (sometimes referred to as a “subject matter eligibility” or “Alice” rejection), that means the examiner believes that your claims relate to a type of invention that is ineligible for patent protection.

How does claim construction work?

Claim construction is the process in which courts interpret the meaning and scope of a patent’s claims. Since the claims “define the invention to which the patentee is entitled the right to exclude,” construing the claims can be a critical step in determining the outcome of almost all patent litigations.

What is the Phillips claim construction standard?

The Phillips standard differs by requiring that claims be given their ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention, by considering the claims, specification, and prosecution history, as well as evidence extrinsic to the patent, when construing patent claims.

What is the difference between enablement and written description?

First is the enablement requirement, next is the best mode requirement and finally is the written description requirement. The enablement requirement requires the inventor to describe his or her invention in a manner that would allow others in the industry to make and use the invention.

What is an obviousness rejection?

When claims are rejected as being obvious, it means that the examiner did not find all elements in a single prior art reference. Instead, the examiner may use a combination of prior art references to reject a claim as covering an obvious invention.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCweVrj2ikUOtFwNvTkM8Gew